Computer Says No.
I am learning to adjust to my new found free evenings.
One past time is perusing through the internet reading the day’s news and nonsense-s. I’ve also been playing these stupid peek-a-boo games with myself by viewing escort malls and forums and then deleting my web history as if to wash away my guilt for looking. I have issues….
I came upon a blog from a “Lovely…” companion who’s recent entry pertained to reviews. Reviews are subjective and should not be entirely adhered to- UNLESS- that saber tooth escort that claimed to be a svelte 22-year-old model was actually a 52-year-old BBW that maliciously nicked your wallet while…well, you get the picture. A well written review is warranted in such an instance. But women are not and should never be “reviewed” like cattle’s. I find it disgusting, disturbing and disrespectful.
I remember my very first review. It was a fake review written by someone who I’d never seen. The reviewer claimed to have visited me in my incall location and trumped-up a few this and that’s about our so-called meeting. It was completely false.
Such falseness may or may not have provoked additional interest in a gentleman contacting me, but, I presume, that if I really cared and if I were one that thrived on reviews and being reviewed it would have mattered. However, it mattered in a different way. The notion of performance.
So, in retrospect, sorry to those that were anxiously awaiting my super flexible and deliciously mind-blowing performance…computer says no (cough, cough).
Reviews are rarely (if ever) about the escort’s performance. They’re self-serving, self-aggrandizing accounts of the writer’s own prowess.
http://hookeraddict.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/two-thumbs-up-way-up/
To give acknowledgment where acknowledgment is due, these crass review sites have been able to solidify a strong customer base. Because of this base and respective audience such vileness will be difficult to eradicate and such self-serving accounts will continue…,